Saturday, March 28, 2009

Brian Walker Explains Walker Commercial Funding's Business Model

Hey Folks,
This is the first is a series of videos that explain Walker Commercial Funding's business model, philosophies and protocol for our borrower to maximize their experience with our company. Subsequent videos will be more focused on specific products and market niches where we are able to perform. As you know this is a moving target, so check in daily....or subscribe to my www.youtube.com account to get the videos delivered directly to you.

On a final note, these videos are to to inform and educate, I'm no Brad Pitt, but we do know how to get your loans funded...and we are the undisputed Picasso's in that space. If you are more into the written word, you can find our published articles here.
Thanks,
Brian Walker
Walker Commercial Funding

Walker Commercial Funding is Funding Mexican Projects! International Funding Has Officially Thawed!


Hey Folks, the ice has finally thawed for funding Mexican projects. I'm very pleased to announce that we will be closing 3 three Mexican transactions (one land and two resort projects) on Monday and Tuesday of this week. No, these are not miracle closings. They are just "make sense" deals that should have been funded a year ago when the market just completely locked up.

The good news, however is that funding is happening again..at low LTVs. These projects all have 65% LTC or less, but we can now honestly say that the international funding windows are now open again!

Walker Commercial Funding can be reached at 281-852-9422. We consists of 20 seasoned commercial professionals, speak 8 languages, live on 4 continents and have our own in-house underwiting department. Please visit our spanish website for our spanish speaking professionals.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Brokers Working In the Spirit of Cooperation- Broker Etiquette



The last two years of the banking debacle has had an unfortunate result for commercial developers. Anyone in the industry knows that very few commercial loans were actually funded in 2007 and 2008. This is a time when institutional banks hemmed and hawed, changed their guidelines and sat on top of loans that they never funded. The truth is that they did not have the liquidity to perform but just did not have the courage to turn away business for fear of losing depositors.

The only loans that closed were those that were being submitted to the private bankers and asset managers. We know this to be true because our company, has always worked exclusively in this space: private equity and asset based lending. Now that the commercial world has come to the awakening that their main street bank is not going to loan them any funds for their project, they are crossing over to the private money world to get back on their feet.

Out of their desperation, the developers may have contacted multiple brokers (who have no connections in the private money world), and eventually find a performing funder. By the time the loan gets to our desk, it looks like this: Joe referred it to Bob, who referred it to Jane and Jane presented the project to us. We are direct to the private money. Now we have a daisy chain of 3 brokers, all expecting to make 2 points for "funding the loan", and the developer is nervous because Joe tells him he's going to have to charge him 8 points...to include 2 points for everyone, including us.

This is where we step in and give everyone a reality check. No one in the chain is entitled to anything other than a referral fee. The only broker entitled to a commission, by law, is the procuring broker. That woud be us. Of course, there is always diplomacy in distributing the commission. We don't have to wave the law into the other broker's faces, but we always clearly explain that we need to work in the spirit of cooperation and the service agreement the borrower signed is void because they didn't actually provide the funding source, they merely referred him to the source.

It works both ways, there are times when we co-broker and take a referral fee from another broker. In this market it's all about working in the spirit of cooperation with other brokers and developers and just getting the project funded. We are direct to 10 private funding sources, but use several others, always putting the client first.

Brian Walker President and CEO Walker Commercial Funding Please visit our website for more information on our programs and services http://www.walkercf.com brian@walkercf.com (281) 877-8440 Skype: brian.walker7 Walker Commercial Funding speaks 8 languages and funds world-wide! Feel free to contact Brian Walker with any questions you may have.

Brian Walker, President and CEO of Walker Commercial Funding

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Multifamily Financing Rides Again!



Hey folks, if you have a multifamily project: refi or construction....bring it on!
Many failed condo projects are now converting to multifamily or condo rentals so they can get financed and get back to work! Call Brian Walker with Walker Commercial Funding at 281-852-8298 or brian@walkercf.com for details.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Refinances for 10M and up properties, Must have 5M in Equity

No Credit Check

No DSCR (it doesn't have to cash flow)

5% interest rate fixed for 3 years

3 Year balloon and no payments for three years.

Call Brian Walker at 281-852-8298 for more info.

wwww.walkercf.com
Brian Walker is President and CEO of Walker Commercial Funding. Walker Commercial Funding funds projects around the globe, but this program is restricted to the US.

Funding your mining projects

Read this article!

Other Articles by Brian Walker of Walker Commercial Funding

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Our Websites Are In Spanish and Dutch!





As you know, Walker Commercial Funding has a world-wide presence. I encourage to visit our websites translated in both Spanish and Dutch

Our international team speaks a total of 8 languages and our funders are presently in the US, Europe, Australia and Asia.

http://www.walkerprestamoscomerciales.com - Spanish
http://www.walkercf.eu - Dutch
http://www.walkercf.com - English

Thursday, March 19, 2009

New Commercial Refi Program for Properties 10M and Above

COMMERICAL LOAN OFFER


WE ARE PRESENTING LOANS TO AVAIL AN ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO THE REFINANCE OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY IN THE USA

The Commercial Lender / Operator that we introduce will refinance your Commercial Property in the United States (mainland) using the following formula;


50% of the Appraised Value

- any/all Debts against the Property

= Equity

X Multiple of up to 10



Wherein, if the Appraised Value of the Property is USD $ 20 Million and fifty percent (50%) of that Value is USD $ 10 Million and assuming there is an unpaid Mortgage on said Property of USD $ 4 Million, then the Equity balance via this formula would be

USD $ 6 Million.

The Lender / Operator will afford a loan of up to ten (10) times the Equity, so assuming upon evaluation, a 5 X multiple is requested and/or accepted then the loan of

USD $ 30 Million (20M x 50% - 4M = 6M x 5 = 30M).



The LOANS are presented as

»5% Interest – Fixed

»3 Year Balloon

»NO Payments for the 3 Years (optional)

»NO Personal guarantees



The MINIMUM Equity against which this type of Loan is offered is USD $ 5 Million.



TO APPLY –

One (1) Page Loan Application (Simple Form Letter. NO form 1003)

Copy of Title Policy

Copy of Current Appraisal



NO credit review, NO personal guarantee, NO lengthy mortgage application.



Please review and advise if you should have any questions or comments.

We look forward to assisting you.

Interest rate is 5% fixed.

· No Raw Land

· US Only

· Must be Brick and Sticks….

· NO DSCR

Walker Commercial Funding www.walkercf.com brian@walkercf.com 281-852-8298

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The Truth About Getting a 100% LTV Commercial Loan

Here's the reality about getting 100% financing for commercial projects in 2009. At Walker Commercial Funding, we always tell the truth. The good truth or the bad truth, but it is the truth. So, with that being said, here is the truth about the 100% financing that is currently available:

1. You could get a joint venture partner, but you must have a very attractive project. Please read this article for a more clear definition of what is available in the JV world and what JV/Venture capital is requiring to take on your project. Read This Article

2. You can nearly gaurantee your success by going through a structured finance program. We are master brokers to a firm that specializes in this type of transaction. It is nothing new and the probablity of success is very high if your project is accepted. The firm we work with is both an international law firm and a licensed financial institution. They require a $100,000 retainer and the process takes 12 months to fund. Their competitors charge an excess of $500,000 and don't even provide the collateral to complete the transaction.

3. The other option involves working with our asset managers that will fund your project at 100% LTC, but they will require that you deposit a substantial amount of collateral with them. The benefit to this program is your collateral will generate handsome returns while you get your project financed at 100% LTC.

Mortgage Brokers that Charge Upfront Fees

Hey Folks...here's some good advice..please click on the line below....


Beware of the Mortgage Broker That Charges Upfront Fees!


As Featured On EzineArticles

Monday, March 16, 2009

Why Everyone Hates Ethanol....from WSJ

Hey folks...I think the days for Ethanol Project fundings are numbered...this is from the Wall Street Journal Opinion Page:

Why Everyone Hates Ethanol

These days, it's routine for businesses to fail, get rescued by the government, and then continue to fail. But ethanol, which survives only because of its iron lung of subsidies and mandates, is a special case. Naturally, the industry is demanding even more government life support.

Corn ethanol producers -- led by Wesley Clark, the retired general turned chairman of a new biofuels lobbying outfit called Growth Energy -- want the Obama Administration to make their guaranteed market even larger. Recall that the 2007 energy bill requires refiners to mix 36 billion gallons into the gasoline supply by 2022. The quotas, which ratchet up each year, are arbitrary, but evidently no one in Congress wondered what might happen if the economy didn't cooperate.

Now the recession is hammering demand for gas. The Energy Information Administration notes that U.S. consumption fell nearly 7% in 2008 and expects another 2.2% drop this year. That comes as great news for President Obama, who is achieving his carbon-reduction goals even without a new carbon tax, but the irony is that the ethanol industry is part of the wider collateral damage.

Americans are unlikely to use enough gas next year to absorb the 13 billion gallons of ethanol that Congress mandated, because current regulations limit the ethanol content in each gallon of gas at 10%. The industry is asking that this cap be lifted to 15% or even 20%. That way, more ethanol can be mixed with less gas, and producers won't end up with a glut that the government does not require anyone to buy.

The ethanol boosters aren't troubled that only a fraction of the 240 million cars and trucks on the road today can run with ethanol blends higher than 10%. It can damage engines and corrode automotive pipes, as well as impair some safety features, especially in older vehicles. It can also overwhelm pollution control systems like catalytic converters. The malfunctions multiply in other products that use gas, such as boats, snowmobiles, lawnmowers, chainsaws, etc.

That possible policy train wreck is uniting almost every other Washington lobby -- and talk about strange bedfellows. The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the Motorcycle Industry Council and the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute, among others, are opposed, since raising the blend limit will ruin their products. The left-leaning American Lung Association and the Union of Concerned Scientists are opposed too, since it will increase auto emissions. The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club agree, on top of growing scientific evidence that corn ethanol provides little or no net reduction in CO2 over the gasoline it displaces.

The biggest losers in this scheme are U.S. oil refiners. Liability for any problems arising from ethanol blending rests with them, because Congress refused to grant legal immunity for selling a product that complies with the mandates that it ordered. The refiners are also set to pay stiff fines for not fulfilling Congress's mandates for second-generation cellulosic ethanol. But the cellulosic ethanol makers themselves already concede that they won't be able to churn out enough of the stuff -- 100 million gallons next year, 250 million gallons in 2011 -- to meet the targets that Congress wrote two years ago.

So successful but politically unpopular businesses will be punished for not buying a product that does not exist -- from companies that haven't yet found a way to succeed despite generous political and taxpayer advantages. The next step is to use cap and trade to make green alternatives look artificially good by comparison. Even then they'll probably still be bottomless money pits.

To recap: Congress and the ethanol lobby argue that if some outcome would be politically nice, it should be mandated (details to follow). Then a new round of market interventions is necessary to fix the economic harm resulting from the previous requirements, while creating more damage in the process. Ethanol is one of the most shameless energy rackets going, in a field with no shortage of competitors.

Subscribe to my online articles...

Please click on the link below and then select: subcribe...there should be an article a day being released for the next 10 days or so...enjoy!

http://ezinearticles.com/?expert_bio=Brian_W._Walker

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Rules of the Road for Land Financing in 2009


For the last two years, I have seen flyers and rate sheets cross my desk that had a funder's matrix of loans and rates. At the bottom of the sheet in large, bold, red letters I would read, "No Raw Land Submissions." This simply meant that funders were not funding land transactions under any circumstances. No cash-out refinances, no purchases....they just had no appetite for land transactions. Fortunately, we have seen a change in the recent weeks and funders have opened their doors again to funding land transactions.

Funding them is good news. The terms, however, are very narrow and specific. In efforts to manage everyone's expectations, I will give you a broad view of what types of transactions are within our funder's proverbial "strike zone." For US and International properties, the maximum loan-to-value is 65%, which means you would need to put 35% down on a purchase. Additionally, the funder wants to see a business plan showing that you have intentions of improving the property and developing it immediately. The logic behind this is that raw land doesn't generate enough revenue to service the debt payment. Knowing this, the funder is going to allow deferred payments for up to two years.

By deferring payments, they simply bump the loan amount by 24 months of payments, put it into an escrow account and payments are made for you. Yes, you borrowed the money for the payments, but it would be impossible to make payments on land that isn't producing any revenue for you. What happens most often is the funder also lends you enough money to put the infrastructure of your development in, which will increase the value the property by a factor of 30-50%.

Once the developer has the infrastructure in place, he can the go get a construction loan and pay off the land. The good news is lenders are lending again on land. You just need to be prepared to have a strong business plan and begin your project immediately.

Friday, March 13, 2009

New Funding Opportunity for Green Projects

You must have 300K cash and a schedule of use of funds of at least 20M USD. This can fund in 60 days. Call Brian at 281-852-8298 for details.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Project funding for projects in Algeria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia


Project funding for projects in Algeria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia

Hey folks! Traditionally, these geographic locations haven't exactly been funding hotspots, but we now have access to private investors that have interest in funding these locations exclusively...they prefer manufacturing type projects or something more toward the industrial side...if you have any of these projects, please feel free to contact me at brian@walkercf.com or 281-852-8298.

Why Funders Aren't Funding Vegas Right Now..

Vegas is a tough market...but we have solutions if you are willing to wait 12 months for funding...and yes, it is 100% LTV funding.











Good News For Failed Condo Projects/Financing

The great thing about the American construction developer is that the never give up. In the past 24 months the condo developers have had an impossible time getting financed. Several reasons were overdeveloping, bad price points and just the economy in general.
In my line of work, I saw lenders advertising their programs and at the bottom of their flyers, in large red letters they would post: "No Condos, Residential Developments, or Raw Land".
At last, a solution as arrived on the scene of this economic disaster for the condo developer. It's not exactly a condo solution, but it is a solution that a) makes sense, b) serves the market, and c) gets the developers back on their feet and back to work....which ultimately boosts our ailing economy.
The solution is simple: there is a new funding program in the private sector that is very flexible and very favorable towards mulitfamily projects and apartments. Developers don't have to lie or misrepresent themselves, they simply need to change their unfunded project into a multifamily or apartment project. Same tract of land, the structure can even be very, very similar. It simply cannot be called a "condo" project. The key to success is having a direct conversation with the funder, and sharing exactly what is in place now. The funder will then tell the developer exactly how the project needs to be tweaked in order to fit into the funder's funding footprint.
The other good news is the rates are fantastic. These are not "hard money" terms, which were the only solutions for these projects in the past.

Bankers Rush to the exits....from the WSJ

Hey folks...this is just more reason to come on over to the private finance side of the fence...come see us at www.walkercf.com

By MATTHEW KARNITSCHNIG and HEIDI N. MOORE

The exodus has begun.

A number of prominent investment bankers are fleeing major Wall Street institutions amid a bracing economic outlook, increased public scrutiny of their pay and mounting turmoil in their own offices.

Wall Street has announced tens of thousands of layoffs since the financial crisis worsened this fall. But most firms have managed to hold on to their top "rainmakers" -- veteran bankers with relationships that brought in revenues for bond deals, mergers and stock offerings.
[Wall Street bankers] Rob Shepperson

That has begun to change, as the government's intervention in the financial sector has begun to spell the end of the freewheeling, big-paycheck culture that pervaded the firms.

The past week alone has seen the announcement of several high-profile departures: Jean Manas, head of Americas M&A for Deutsche Bank; Deutsche Bank media banker Fehmi Zeko; Goldman Sachs Group partner Joseph Ravitch; and UBS managing director Jeff Sine. They follow a parade of other senior bankers who have recently left big firms, including Robert Scully at Morgan Stanley, former UBS Vice Chairman Robert Gillespie, and George Ackert, the former head of Merrill Lynch's transportation group.

In London, the exodus of talent has been no less acute than in New York. At Bank of America, for example, where bankers are grappling with both the financial downturn and a tumultuous takeover of Merrill Lynch, a raft of senior Merrill bankers have jumped ship. Many of them, including Mark Aedy, the recently named head of corporate and investment banking for Europe who was close to such blue-chip Merrill investment-banking clients as miner BHP Billiton, have left without another job lined up.

Some of the refugees are seeking to join boutiques firms, such as Evercore, Greenhill or Centerview Partners, while others are getting out of the game altogether.

For some, the motivation to leave is the same one that drew them to Wall Street in the first place: money.

In the past, many of these bankers would have been locked in place with stock options, accumulated after years of toiling from junior analyst to managing director. History is now of little concern as many firms are remade or wiped out by mergers, and stock options are mostly worthless. The market's collapse has also laid bare tensions between traders who generated most of the firms' outsize profits -- and losses -- over the past five years and the advisers who weren't risking firm capital.

"I still believe in the investment-banking business, but it has become a bit of a boat anchor, in that there doesn't seem to be a difference between an advisory banker who generates fees without capital and a [proprietary] trader whose job is like going to the casino every day," said one senior banker who is still constrained by agreements with his former firm.

Adds Alan Johnson of Wall Street compensation-consulting firm Johnson Associates, "At the moment, no one can tell bankers whether they will or won't get paid for the work they do in 2009. It will get worse the longer this goes on."

Bankers at closely held firms have been spared the ire faced by employees of banks that have received public support. But boutiques aren't a total safe haven. Bankers there are paid almost entirely by "eating what they kill," while the larger Wall Street firms have historically offered somewhat lower, but more consistent, pay.

"Deutsche Bank has and will weather the storm better than most, but at this stage in my life the private model is a better opportunity for success," Mr. Zeko said.

Reversing the brain drain could take time. Wall Street firms fired many midlevel bankers in 2001 and 2002, forcing senior bankers to stay longer. As a result, there isn't a big corps of up-and-comers to replace the veterans, many of whom are already wealthy and can easily retire.

At UBS, one banker recently complained that his staff's bonuses were sharply cut after the bank had already set aside money the prior nine months.

Survivors say these actions have poisoned the atmosphere at many banks. "I don't feel like I'm a manager when we ask for all the work and we give them no rewards," said the senior banker who recently decamped.
—Dana Cimilluca contributed to this article.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Financing Available for Qualified Film Projects


Finance available for feature length films from $2 to $60 million
We can finance feature length movies including those for children and made for television.
Our funders are currently are financing 56 feature length movies with 14 only with a above the line name brand produces/director or actors/actresses.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Energy Projects Funded with Contract Funding

Energy companies are finding new ways to finance their projects in these tough times for project finance. Most banks or traditional lending options require the developer to have a minimum of 30% down...and worse yet, many banks just aren't lending. There is, however, a solution!

Energy companies are working in the spirit of cooperation with their buyers, or "off-takers" and structuring contracts that enable the the developer to be funded in as short as two weeks...and the buyer can even structure the agreement in a way that enables them to defer payments for up to three years. Everyone wins! Most importantly, developers can get back on their feet and begin working again.

There are a few stipulations in order to successfully fund a contract. First, the buyers must agree to "take-or-pay" terms. In short, this is an absolute guarantee to purchase the product. Additionally, the buyer must have good credit. They must have a credit rating by Moodys or Standard and Poors of triple B or better. The other conditions to fund the contract are simple: they must be sum specific, date specific, and dollar specific. It's really that simple. Most government agencies and municipalities meet the minimum rating requirements. Some companies are even using this method of contract funding to fund their tax credits. As long as everything in the tax credit is spelled out as specific dollar, date, and the absolute language is used, the tax credits can be used to fund the project as well.

Walker Commercial Funding Brian Walker http://www.walkercf.com brian@walkercf.com (281)852-8298

Private Equity is funding again!

It's not as bad as seems...unless you are looking for loans in all the wrong places. Yes, institutional banks are not funding loans and you are on a fools errand by even calling them. We are, however, finding a lot of private equity funders coming out of the wood work....
They like to see a lot equity in the project as well as a strong management team. If you have one of these projects...feel free to give me a jingle at 281-852-8298 or brian@walkercf.com

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Bridge loans for Central America and Mexican developers

Yes!
We have funding for developers in Central and South America. Countries we are actively funding in include Costa Rica, Mexico, Domincan Repubic, Panama and most countries in South America. Our "strike zone" is 65% loan-to-cost or or less. Typically, we'll fund the bridge at this ratio and then do the take-out so the developer can finish what they have started.

Please contact me at 281-852-8298 for more information ...or click on the skype button below for the quickest response...


My status
My status

Get Skype and call me for free.